I tweeted that the argument comparing spoons for obesity and guns for murders is ridiculous. So I got many tweets in response along these lines:
"guns & spoons are apt comparisons in that the gun doesn't cause violence in the same way spoons don't cause obesity."
Why registering guns like cars is a bad idea:
"that's called prior restraint, and is the antithesis of a right"
"Perhaps then we need to regulate EVERY object that could be used to cause death.... like shoe strings..."
"Yep, I'm all for licensing and registration in order to vote and have free speech"
Are you registered to be protected by the Constitution? NO? Hahahaha, you're fucked.
Of course, wanting gun restrictions makes me a bigot:
u just dont want poor ppl to afford guns
And my favorites, the good old "making me register my guns is bad because...um...the Holocaust":
"i wanna register as a jew...wait, on second though, probably NOT a good idea"
Do they want gun owners to walk around wearing a pin to let ppl know they are gun owners too?
"i'd register my religion, but that usually works out as well as registering gun"
"she [Me] isnt familiar with the events immediately following KRYSTALNACHT."
This is what we're up against. These are well-reasoned, logical arguments against gun control. I'll never understand why politicians can't stand up against this. It's nonsense. Why is this so hard to combat in legislation? It's not like there's this incredibly rich, incredibly powerful lobbying organization that feeds voters this nonsense and bribes and threatens politicians so they bend to their will. Right?
No comments:
Post a Comment